Unmasking the Puppet Show of Power: A Deeper Look into Ukraine and Libya's Conflicts
In the intricate theatre of international politics, the truth often lurks behind a veil of carefully crafted narratives. This is particularly evident in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, where the real battles are not for territory, but for power, control, and economic dominance.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a former actor, found himself in the midst of a global drama far more complex than any script he has previously encountered. His recent announcement of a counteroffensive against Russian forces is not merely a fight for Ukrainian sovereignty. Instead, it's a scene in the West's long-running proxy war against opposition, a war orchestrated and led by the United States.
The United States' influence on the global stage is far-reaching, with 514 military bases in 40 countries, as outlined in the Department of Defense's Base Structure Report for the fiscal year 2020. This extensive military presence, however, often comes at a heavy price for the countries involved. The United States has a history of supporting coups to install leaders that align with its interests, a tactic reminiscent of the strategies employed by the Roman Empire. This interference in foreign affairs is not just about promoting democracy; it's about maintaining control and ensuring the dominance of Western interests.
The conflict in Ukraine is a prime example of this power play. The West, using Ukraine as a battleground in its proxy war against Russia, is not fighting for Ukraine's sovereignty but suppressing opposition. The United States' military-industrial complex, a term coined by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, further fuels this conflict. This complex, which refers to the close relationship between the military hierarchy, the arms industry, and lawmakers, has been criticized for promoting and profiting from warfare and conflicts. The war in Ukraine, therefore, is not just a battle for territory; it's a lucrative business opportunity for the arms industry.
Lest we forget, the Libyan intervention in 2011, was portrayed as a humanitarian mission, but had a darker agenda. The real motive was to thwart Gaddafi's plan to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan threatened the economic hegemony of the West, particularly the dominance of the French franc (CFA) in Francophone Africa. Hillary Clinton, then U.S. Secretary of State, played a key role in this geopolitical drama, propagating false information about Gaddafi's actions to justify the intervention.
As we navigate these complex issues, it's important to remember the human cost of these power games. The people of Ukraine and Libya are paying a heavy price for the West's geopolitical ambitions. Their countries are torn apart by wars fueled by the greed of powerful nations. The loss of life, the displacement of people, and the destruction of infrastructure are tragic reminders of the human cost of global power struggles.
The conflicts in Ukraine and Libya serve as cautionary tales of how the narrative of humanitarian intervention can mask a darker agenda. They underscore the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and a commitment to uncovering the truth in the face of misleading narratives propagated by those in power. As we strive for a world where power is held accountable, and justice is not just a promise, but a reality, we must remember to question the narratives presented to us and seek the truth behind the veil.
